Skip to main content

Messaging App Privacy Grades

4 companies analysed · Sorted by privacy score

End-to-end encryption protects message bodies, but it does not erase the graph of who talks to whom, when, and from which devices—metadata that courts and advertisers have long treated as highly revealing. Some apps sync entire address books to the cloud, log IP and device fingerprints, or fuse chat behaviour with parent-company ad profiles; others cap logs, use privacy-preserving contact discovery, or avoid an ads business altogether. Enterprise or “business” tiers can add another layer—archiving, e-discovery, and admin visibility—that personal users easily miss. When comparing products, look for explicit retention periods, clarity on voice and media backups, and whether linking to a social graph is optional. Our rankings weight collection and sharing of metadata as heavily as the encryption headline. Full scoring rules are explained on the About page.

#CompanyGradeScoreIn plain English
1
Signal logoSignal
A87/100Signal is a nonprofit that genuinely cannot read your messages or listen to your calls — the encrypt…
2
Zoom logoZoom
C+62/100Zoom explicitly won't use your meeting, chat, or video content to train AI models — a meaningful com…
3
Discord logoDiscord
C+58/100Discord collects your messages, activity, device data, and behavioural signals, and uses them for pe…
4
WhatsApp logoWhatsApp
D35/100WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption genuinely protects your message content, but everything around it —…
How we grade·Each company is scored 0–100 across four pillars: data collection, third-party sharing, user controls, and policy promises. The overall grade maps to the score band. → Read the full methodology

More categories