Samsung vs 1Password
Based on our analysis, 1Password is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Samsung | 1Password |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | D · 39/100 | B · 74/100 |
| What they collect | Concern (25) | Mixed (78) |
| Who they share it with | Concern (32) | Mixed (65) |
| What you can do | Mixed (50) | Mixed (73) |
| What they promise | Mixed (45) | Mixed (76) |
Samsung's data appetite is unusually broad for a hardware maker: voice recordings stored on servers with potential third-party retention, keyboard input logging via Predictive Text synced across devices, and persistent hardware identifiers that survive ad-ID resets. The company explicitly acknowledges that sharing with business partners may constitute a data sale under US law (CCPA). Full GDPR-grade rights are reserved for EEA/UK/Swiss residents; everyone else gets basic access and deletion with no response-time commitments. Retention timelines are vague and there are no named security certifications or breach notification windows.
View full analysis →1Password can never read your saved passwords — they're end-to-end encrypted and even 1Password holds no keys — but outside the vault, the company collects substantial usage and diagnostic data, shares information with advertising partners in ways that may legally count as a data sale, and applies vague retention language to everything that isn't your vault content.
View full analysis →