Vercel Inc. vs Cursor
Based on our analysis, Vercel Inc. is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Vercel Inc. | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | B · 72/100 | C+ · 58/100 |
| What they collect | Mixed (65) | Concern (45) |
| Who they share it with | Mixed (68) | Mixed (52) |
| What you can do | Positive (78) | Mixed (62) |
| What they promise | Positive (76) | Positive (72) |
Vercel collects your account data, professional info, and — critically for developers — your source code and deployment content to run the platform. They don't run an ad business and explicitly prohibit staff from viewing your code except to fix support issues. The main caveats are AI product data collection, third-party marketing partners, and a California-specific admission that they may 'share' data for cross-contextual advertising for their own marketing.
View full analysis →Cursor collects account data (name, email, payment), device and usage data, and — critically — "Inputs" (code snippets, prompts) and "Suggestions" (AI responses). In Privacy Mode ON, code and prompts are processed in memory only and never persisted; they have zero data retention agreements with OpenAI and Anthropic. In Privacy Mode OFF (default on Free/Pro), this data is stored and may be used to evaluate and improve AI. Cursor does not sell your data or use it for targeted advertising. Business plans default to Privacy Mode on.
View full analysis →