Signal vs Fastmail
Based on our analysis, Signal is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Signal | Fastmail |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | A · 87/100 | B+ · 79/100 |
| What they collect | Positive (88) | Mixed (74) |
| Who they share it with | Positive (88) | Mixed (76) |
| What you can do | Mixed (78) | Positive (82) |
| What they promise | Positive (86) | Mixed (80) |
Signal is a nonprofit that genuinely cannot read your messages or listen to your calls — the encryption is architectural, not a promise — but it requires a real phone number to register, is subject to US law, and its privacy policy is conspicuously sparse: it hasn't been substantively updated since 2018 and lacks the specific retention periods, GDPR rights, or DPO contact that more thorough policies provide.
View full analysis →Fastmail is a paid email provider that doesn't sell your data or serve ads, has clear retention periods and a transparency report — but unlike Proton, staff can technically access your emails, data moves through US and Indian infrastructure, and IP logs are kept for a year.
View full analysis →