Signal vs Ente
Based on our analysis, Ente is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Signal | Ente |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | A · 87/100 | A · 91/100 |
| What they collect | Positive (88) | Positive (92) |
| Who they share it with | Positive (88) | Positive (86) |
| What you can do | Mixed (78) | Positive (88) |
| What they promise | Positive (86) | Positive (89) |
Signal is a nonprofit that genuinely cannot read your messages or listen to your calls — the encryption is architectural, not a promise — but it requires a real phone number to register, is subject to US law, and its privacy policy is conspicuously sparse: it hasn't been substantively updated since 2018 and lacks the specific retention periods, GDPR rights, or DPO contact that more thorough policies provide.
View full analysis →Ente is an end-to-end encrypted photo and file storage service where only you hold the decryption keys — the company genuinely cannot read your files even if ordered to; no cookies, no usage analytics, biometric processing happens on-device, and all 19 third-party providers are named; the main caveats are US/Delaware incorporation, PostHog analytics on the website, and some US-based storage and email infrastructure.
View full analysis →