Samsung vs Proton
Based on our analysis, Proton is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Samsung | Proton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | D · 39/100 | A · 88/100 |
| What they collect | Concern (25) | Positive (90) |
| Who they share it with | Concern (32) | Positive (82) |
| What you can do | Mixed (50) | Positive (84) |
| What they promise | Mixed (45) | Positive (86) |
Samsung's data appetite is unusually broad for a hardware maker: voice recordings stored on servers with potential third-party retention, keyboard input logging via Predictive Text synced across devices, and persistent hardware identifiers that survive ad-ID resets. The company explicitly acknowledges that sharing with business partners may constitute a data sale under US law (CCPA). Full GDPR-grade rights are reserved for EEA/UK/Swiss residents; everyone else gets basic access and deletion with no response-time commitments. Retention timelines are vague and there are no named security certifications or breach notification windows.
View full analysis →Proton collects as little as technically possible, can't read your encrypted content even if asked, is governed by strict Swiss law, and gives you real control — the rare case where the privacy policy matches the privacy pitch.
View full analysis →