Microsoft vs Signal
Based on our analysis, Signal is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Microsoft | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | C- · 44/100 | A · 87/100 |
| What they collect | Concern (35) | Positive (88) |
| Who they share it with | Concern (40) | Positive (88) |
| What you can do | Mixed (58) | Mixed (78) |
| What they promise | Mixed (52) | Positive (86) |
Microsoft's privacy statement covers an enormous product surface — Windows, Office, Azure, Bing, Xbox, and Copilot — and the data practices vary dramatically across them. The umbrella policy is deliberately vague, deferring almost all specifics to product-level documentation. Cross-product data combination, AI model training on your content, and employer/school access to your files and communications are the key risks most consumers don't realise they're accepting.
View full analysis →Signal is a nonprofit that genuinely cannot read your messages or listen to your calls — the encryption is architectural, not a promise — but it requires a real phone number to register, is subject to US law, and its privacy policy is conspicuously sparse: it hasn't been substantively updated since 2018 and lacks the specific retention periods, GDPR rights, or DPO contact that more thorough policies provide.
View full analysis →