Kagi vs Signal
Based on our analysis, Kagi is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Kagi | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | A · 88/100 | A · 87/100 |
| What they collect | Positive (91) | Positive (88) |
| Who they share it with | Positive (85) | Positive (88) |
| What you can do | Positive (86) | Mixed (78) |
| What they promise | Positive (88) | Positive (86) |
Kagi is a paid search engine that treats your data as a liability rather than an asset — it doesn't track your searches, offers cryptocurrency and Tor payment options for near-total anonymity, and publishes a warrant canary; the main caveats are US jurisdiction, third-party content providers loaded on demand, and 'whenever possible' hedging on its AI providers.
View full analysis →Signal is a nonprofit that genuinely cannot read your messages or listen to your calls — the encryption is architectural, not a promise — but it requires a real phone number to register, is subject to US law, and its privacy policy is conspicuously sparse: it hasn't been substantively updated since 2018 and lacks the specific retention periods, GDPR rights, or DPO contact that more thorough policies provide.
View full analysis →