Kagi vs Microsoft
Based on our analysis, Kagi is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Kagi | Microsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | A · 88/100 | C- · 44/100 |
| What they collect | Positive (91) | Concern (35) |
| Who they share it with | Positive (85) | Concern (40) |
| What you can do | Positive (86) | Mixed (58) |
| What they promise | Positive (88) | Mixed (52) |
Kagi is a paid search engine that treats your data as a liability rather than an asset — it doesn't track your searches, offers cryptocurrency and Tor payment options for near-total anonymity, and publishes a warrant canary; the main caveats are US jurisdiction, third-party content providers loaded on demand, and 'whenever possible' hedging on its AI providers.
View full analysis →Microsoft's privacy statement covers an enormous product surface — Windows, Office, Azure, Bing, Xbox, and Copilot — and the data practices vary dramatically across them. The umbrella policy is deliberately vague, deferring almost all specifics to product-level documentation. Cross-product data combination, AI model training on your content, and employer/school access to your files and communications are the key risks most consumers don't realise they're accepting.
View full analysis →