Ente vs Bitwarden
Based on our analysis, Ente is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Ente | Bitwarden |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | A · 91/100 | B+ · 79/100 |
| What they collect | Positive (92) | Mixed (76) |
| Who they share it with | Positive (86) | Mixed (73) |
| What you can do | Positive (88) | Mixed (77) |
| What they promise | Positive (89) | Mixed (78) |
Ente is an end-to-end encrypted photo and file storage service where only you hold the decryption keys — the company genuinely cannot read your files even if ordered to; no cookies, no usage analytics, biometric processing happens on-device, and all 19 third-party providers are named; the main caveats are US/Delaware incorporation, PostHog analytics on the website, and some US-based storage and email infrastructure.
View full analysis →Bitwarden is an open source password manager that encrypts your vault on-device so it cannot read your passwords — but it uses Google Analytics on both the website and service, is a US company subject to FTC jurisdiction and government requests, collects meaningful amounts of administrative data for marketing and product improvement, and uses legitimate interest as a legal basis for several secondary data uses.
View full analysis →