Cursor vs Apple
Based on our analysis, Apple is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Cursor | Apple |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | C+ · 58/100 | B+ · 78/100 |
| What they collect | Concern (45) | Mixed (72) |
| Who they share it with | Mixed (52) | Positive (82) |
| What you can do | Mixed (62) | Positive (80) |
| What they promise | Positive (72) | Positive (82) |
Cursor collects account data (name, email, payment), device and usage data, and — critically — "Inputs" (code snippets, prompts) and "Suggestions" (AI responses). In Privacy Mode ON, code and prompts are processed in memory only and never persisted; they have zero data retention agreements with OpenAI and Anthropic. In Privacy Mode OFF (default on Free/Pro), this data is stored and may be used to evaluate and improve AI. Cursor does not sell your data or use it for targeted advertising. Business plans default to Privacy Mode on.
View full analysis →Apple collects significantly less data than other big tech companies and explicitly commits — using both Nevada and California legal definitions — to never selling or sharing your data for advertising. Their own ad platform doesn't use data brokers or cross-app tracking. Private personal data isn't used to train Apple's AI models. The main caveats are health, fitness, and financial data collection, government ID in some cases, and personalised ads that exist but are easy to turn off.
View full analysis →