Based on our analysis, Keeper is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →Overall
Cloaked
C+ · 63/100Keeper
B · 76/100What they collect
Cloaked
Mixed (65)
Keeper
Mixed (76)
Who they share it with
Cloaked
Mixed (62)
Keeper
Mixed (75)
What you can do
Cloaked
Mixed (62)
Keeper
Mixed (72)
What they promise
Cloaked
Mixed (63)
Keeper
Positive (80)
| Category | Cloaked | Keeper |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | C+ · 63/100 | B · 76/100 |
| What they collect | Mixed (65) | Mixed (76) |
| Who they share it with | Mixed (62) | Mixed (75) |
| What you can do | Mixed (62) | Mixed (72) |
| What they promise | Mixed (63) | Positive (80) |
Cloaked is a privacy-masking service with a strong mission, an 'encrypted even from us' architecture claim, and explicit commitments to never sell data, read emails, read texts, or listen to calls — but significant product complexity means multiple features are governed by third-party policies rather than Cloaked's own: the VPN is powered by PureVPN (and PureVPN's policy governs it), financial account connections use Plaid/Stripe/PayPal under their own policies, and the Inbox Cleaner requires Gmail access despite the high-profile 'never read your emails' pledge; additionally, it is a US company governed by Massachusetts law, no security certifications are named, data retention is vague, and it ignores Do Not Track signals.
View full analysis →Keeper is a zero-knowledge password manager with SOC 2, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP High certification — among the strongest independent security credentials of any password manager — and it cannot access your vault contents under any circumstances; the main caveats are that it is a US company (Chicago) hosted on AWS subject to US legal process, uses cookies and marketing tracking on its website, retains data for vaguely defined periods, and enterprise account admins can access usage and interaction data for employees on business plans.
View full analysis →You might also want to compare