Brave vs Microsoft
Based on our analysis, Brave is the more privacy-respecting choice overall.
BACK →| Category | Brave | Microsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | A · 86/100 | C- · 44/100 |
| What they collect | Positive (88) | Concern (35) |
| Who they share it with | Positive (85) | Concern (40) |
| What you can do | Positive (84) | Mixed (58) |
| What they promise | Positive (83) | Mixed (52) |
Brave's browser collects no browsing history and routes most sensitive requests through its own proxies to strip your IP address — the privacy architecture is genuinely sophisticated — but it's a US company, Safe Browsing on mobile exposes your IP to Google or Apple, and Leo AI feedback submissions can include full conversation transcripts retained for a year.
View full analysis →Microsoft's privacy statement covers an enormous product surface — Windows, Office, Azure, Bing, Xbox, and Copilot — and the data practices vary dramatically across them. The umbrella policy is deliberately vague, deferring almost all specifics to product-level documentation. Cross-product data combination, AI model training on your content, and employer/school access to your files and communications are the key risks most consumers don't realise they're accepting.
View full analysis →